top of page
star-logo.png

This is an official CPAC website.

Official websites are at CPAC.org

CPAC.org website is the only official website belonging to CPAC worldwide.

Secure CPAC.org websites use HTTPS

A lock (🔒︎) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the CPAC.org website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

CPAC Gradient Background.png
Untitled design.png
CPAC Gradient Background.png
blog_post_bg.avif

The Right Squad, Mercedes Schlapp: The Supreme Court heard arguments on President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship

  • Writer: Staff Writer
    Staff Writer
  • May 19
  • 2 min read

Mercedes Schlapp on The Right Squad reports that the United States Supreme Court heard arguments on President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. There are also radical leftist judges attempting to stall President Trump from furthering his agenda. 


The President commented on the case last Thursday: 


“Birthright Citizenship was not meant for people taking vacations to become permanent Cirtizens of the United States of America, and bringing their families with them, all the time laughing at the ‘SUCKERS’ that we are! The United States of America is the only Country in the World that does this, for what reason, nobody knows–But the drug cartels love it! ... It [The Fourteenth Amendment] had nothing to do with Illegal Immigration for people wanting to SCAM our Country, from all parts of the World, which they have done for many years. It had to do with the Civil War results, and the babies of slaves who our politicians felt, correctly, needed protection.”


The beginning arguments were not even about the President’s Executive Order on ending Birthright Citizenship, but about whether the universal injunctions by leftist judges were legitimate. 


The United States Solicitor General John Sauer, who is representing the Trump Administration, listed the various problems the universal injunctions made by the leftist judges. 


“Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions. “They encourage rampant forum shopping. They require judges to make rushed low low-information decisions. They circumvent Rule 23 by offering all the benefits but none of the burdens of class certification. They operate asymmetrically, forcing the government to defend everywhere while the plaintiffs can win anywhere. They invert the ordinary hierarchy of a palate review. They increase the risk of conflicting judgments.”, says Solicitor General Sauer.

CPAC for Iranians in Exile - Gradient Background (1).png
Give a one-time contribution

Every gift, no matter the size, plays a vital role in making a meaningful impact. Your contribution helps create positive change, support important causes.

Hero Image Template.png
CPAC Star Loading. . . (4).gif
bottom of page